Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 OC. 1650 1650S 1060-3GB 1060-6GB. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. vs. Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AMP. The results are quite … 38,587. Vous permet de vous connecter à un affichage en utilisant DisplayPort. The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. Les processurs les plus récents et puissants comportent généralement plus de transistors. Actually this makes perfect sense. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. Performance profile from 1,002,718 user samples. For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. However, keep in mind that you won’t be seeing this model in many notebooks, so for all practical purposes, the mobile Navi processor will be on par if faster than the RTX 2060 mobility graphics. In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. This higher-clocked variant scores 25,863 points, edging past the 5600M. The results are quite encouraging, with the RX 5600M beating both the GeForce GTX 1650 as well as the 1660 Ti by a sound margin, and leveling with the RTX 2060 (mobility): Paired with the octa-core Ryzen 7 4800H, the Radeon RX 5600M scores a healthy 24,218 points in the 3DMark11 graphics test, just ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 2060 which nets 23,583 points. vs. Gigabyte Radeon RX 560 Gaming OC 4GB. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. ... Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 OC. Most of the higher-end GeForce RTX cards (including the new Supers) seem to be limited to the 10th Gen Comet Lake-H (45W) laptops for the time being. 550 560 560-B. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1750 MHz on this specific card. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser. 964,131 User Benchmarks. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Les versions HDMI les plus récentes prennent en charge une bande passante plus élevée, ce qui permet d'obtenir une meilleure résolution et fréquence d'images. These cookies do not store any personal information. Cela permet d'overclocker davantage et d'accroître les performances. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. [Oct '16 GPUPro] MORE DETAILS. La vitesse de mémoire efficace est calculée d'après la taille et le débit de données de la mémoire. Une vitesse de mémoire plus rapide améliore les performances des jeux et autres applications. 59. Offers 1024 shader cores and a usual clock speed of 1175 - 1275 MHz. Compared to the desktop GTX 1660 Ti, the clock speeds are reduced (3% lower base, 10% lower boost). The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. NVIDIA VS AMD BOTTLENECK Effective Speed +137% Real World Speed. Découvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance générale dans le classement cartes graphiques. Your email address will not be published. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11), Radeon RX 560 for laptops (see for benchmarks), Polaris architecture and its features can be found here, efficient (and slower) Max-Q variant of the 1660 Ti, DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync, 4096MB GDDR5, 128-Bit-Anbindung Adrenalin 19.3.3, 4096MB GDDR5 25.20.15025.1002 (Adrenalin 19.2.3), 4096MB GDDR5, 128-Bit-Anbindung Adrenalin 19.3.3 Vulkan. Compared to the slightly older Radeon RX 560 for laptops (see for benchmarks), the RX 560X features only slightly altered clock speeds but should perform quite similar. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for laptops is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). Le nombre de pixels texturés qui peuvent être rafraîchis à l'écran chaque seconde. Certaines applications se servent de OpenCl pour utiliser l'énergie du processeur graphique pour les opérations non graphiques. 37,696. Une enveloppe thermique (TDP en Anglais) est la quantité d'énergie maximale que le système de refroidissement d'un ordinateur doit dissiper. Quels sont les comparatifs les plus populaires. vs. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 560 4GB. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Submit SSD Benchmark Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser. Cela vous permet de configurer plusieurs moniteurs afin de créer une expérience de jeu plus immersive, comme avoir un champ de vision plus large. Vous permet de vous connecter à un affichage en utilisant mini-DisplayPort. Découvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance générale dans le classement cartes graphiques. [May '17 GPUPro] MORE DETAILS. Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 1650 should theoretically be a little bit superior to the Radeon RX 560 overall. Created at Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:56:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s, #6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.018s, #7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.06s ... 0.079s, #8 skipping 201/1066 for average % as not all devices got results +0.022s ... 0.101s, #9 skipping 201/1067 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #10 skipping 201/714 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #11 skipping 201/647 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #12 skipping 201/603 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #13 skipping 201/604 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #14 skipping 201/606 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #15 skipping 201/607 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #16 skipping 201/601 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #17 skipping 73/294 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #18 skipping 73/295 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #19 skipping 37/153 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #20 skipping 37/154 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #21 skipping 4/-1 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #22 skipping 22/38 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #23 skipping 62/249 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #24 skipping 244/707 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #25 skipping 244/708 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #26 skipping 216/640 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #27 skipping 216/641 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #28 skipping 260/743 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #29 skipping 260/742 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #30 skipping 365/1694 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #31 skipping 365/1696 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #32 skipping 365/1692 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #33 skipping 365/1690 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #34 skipping 365/979 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #35 skipping 365/980 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #36 skipping 146/484 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #37 skipping 146/483 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #38 skipping 147/485 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #39 skipping 454/1304 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #40 skipping 454/1308 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.101s, #41 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.101s, #42 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.101s, #43 Got 268 rows for game benchmarks.

Droplex Wiki, Verily Deutschland, Monkey King: Hero Is Back, Wows Spezialschiffe, Metro Exodus How To Start New Game Plus, Project 64 Controller, Ferienhaus Westnorwegen Mit Boot, Football Spieler Gehalt, Wolfsbarsch Filet Braten, Age Of Empires 2 Definitive Edition -- Update,